Feature by feature
| Feature | Colldly | Woodpecker |
|---|---|---|
| Company database | Built in | None, import only |
| AI writing from the company website | Yes | No |
| In-thread follow-ups | Yes | Yes |
| Warm-up | Yes, included | Yes |
| Unibox across mailboxes | Yes, with AI sorting | Centralised inbox yes |
| Email verification | Built in | Built-in verification |
| Support | Directly from the people who built it | Ticket queue |
| Starting price | 19 EUR/mo | ~29 USD/mo |
Honestly: who is better at what
No tool wins everything. These are the things Woodpecker does better, and the things where Colldly leads.
Where Woodpecker is better
- Simplicity and reliability: a sender tuned for years that does nothing extra and makes no mistakes.
- Condition-based sequences (if opened, if clicked) and adaptive sending within provider limits.
- An agency panel with client accounts and easy switching.
- A deliverability monitor with inbox placement tests on higher plans.
Where Colldly is better
- Finds and enriches companies: Woodpecker starts at the CSV import.
- The AI writes every email separately from the company's website. Woodpecker sends your templates with variables.
- Address verification included, Unibox with intent, Smart rules based on behaviour.
- Autopilot and client workspaces in Agency, statistics per step, a heatmap and a load forecast.
- Priced per account, not per number of contacted prospects.
Price in practice: three scenarios
A price list is one thing, the monthly invoice another. Three typical situations and what you would pay in each, including the data and verification you usually buy separately with the competition.
Indicative monthly prices from public price lists (2026), excluding VAT, with a 5-step sequence. Colldly: Starter 19 EUR, Pro 39 EUR, Agency 89 EUR including data, AI copy and verification; extra credits from 5 EUR per 500. Competitor prices change, check the current price list.
Switching from Woodpecker to Colldly
What can be carried over, what you rebuild and how to do it without a gap in outreach. Usually one afternoon.
Who should pick which
Pick Woodpecker if
- You have your own data and finished copy
- You only want a reliable sending channel without AI
- You need conditional branching in sequences
Choose Woodpecker if you have your own data, write the copy yourself and only want a reliable sending channel.
Pick Colldly if
- You have nowhere to get companies from and do not want to buy databases
- Writing emails is what slows you down
- You want one account for data, copy, sending and replies
Woodpecker is an honest sender. Colldly adds what takes the most time: finding the companies and writing copy that fits each one. The result: you launch a campaign in an hour instead of two days.
Pick Woodpecker for campaigns with your own lead source if you do not need AI copy.
